Table 2. R²-Coefficients for All of the Curve and Surface Fits^a.

	l = 0		l2 = ⟨l2⟩
complex	R2	RBW2	R2	RBW2	var. l R2	(l-fit) RBW2	var. l R2	(both fits) RBW2
(MetO)2	0.9996	0.9994	0.9995	0.9992	0.9975	0.9957	0.9976	0.9980
(EtO)2	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9992	0.9989	0.9980	0.9967	0.9974
(ProO)2	0.9996	0.9995	0.9991	0.9986	0.9987	0.9978	0.9961	0.9972
(AceO)2	0.9996	0.9994	0.9993	0.9989	0.9988	0.9988	0.9913	0.9940
(ButO)2	0.9995	0.9993	0.9995	0.9993	0.9987	0.9977	0.9950	0.9967
R,R-(BuOHO)2	0.9997	0.9997	0.9991	0.9987	0.9998	0.9996	0.9953	0.9967
R,S-(BuOHO)2	0.9996	0.9995	0.9992	0.9988	0.9995	0.9993	0.9952	0.9970
R-alkoxy,R-nitroxy-α-pin	0.9996	0.9994	0.9974	0.9958	0.9995	0.9994	0.9902	0.9938
R-alkoxy,S-nitroxy-α-pin	0.9997	0.9996	0.9996	0.9994	0.9997	0.9995	0.9943	0.9968
S-alkoxy,R-nitroxy-α-pin	0.9998	0.9997	0.9993	0.9991	0.9998	0.9997	0.9930	0.9939
S-alkoxy,S-nitroxy-α-pin	0.9997	0.9996	0.9996	0.9994	0.9996	0.9995	0.9928	0.9957
(α-pin-O3–RO)2	0.9997	0.9997	0.9995	0.9993	0.9997	0.9996	0.9914	0.9937
MetO-EtO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9990	0.9987	0.9975	0.9966	0.9975
MetO-ProO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9992	0.9979	0.9965	0.9963	0.9970
MetO-AceO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9996	0.9994	0.9974	0.9957	0.9943	0.9961
MetO-ProOHO	0.9996	0.9995	0.9992	0.9989	0.9993	0.9989	0.9950	0.9962
MetO-BuOHO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9991	0.9990	0.9989	0.9932	0.9953
EtO-ProO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9993	0.9990	0.9989	0.9980	0.9962	0.9972
EtO-AceO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9992	0.9990	0.9983	0.9956	0.9967
EtO-ProOHO	0.9997	0.9995	0.9992	0.9989	0.9995	0.9992	0.9950	0.9964
EtO-BuOHO	0.9996	0.9995	0.9991	0.9987	0.9994	0.9991	0.9938	0.9957
ProO-AceO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9994	0.9992	0.9991	0.9985	0.9957	0.9970
ProO-ProOHO	0.9996	0.9994	0.9989	0.9983	0.9995	0.9992	0.9958	0.9970
ProO-BuOHO	0.9996	0.9995	0.9987	0.9980	0.9995	0.9991	0.9953	0.9967
AceO-ProOHO	0.9996	0.9995	0.9992	0.9988	0.9996	0.9993	0.9959	0.9972
AceO-BuOHO	0.9996	0.9995	0.9988	0.9982	0.9996	0.9993	0.9952	0.9967

^aAs you see, the agreement between the function and the trajectory data is in general very good.