Table 2.
Breast MRI (n = 47*) |
PET–CT (n = 45†) |
|
---|---|---|
Accuracy (%) | 77 (62, 88) | 78 (63, 89) |
Sensitivity (%) | 77 (55, 92) | 50 (27, 73) |
Specificity (%) | 76 (55, 91) | 100 (86, 100) |
False-negative rate (1 – sensitivity) (%) | 23 (8, 45) | 50 (27, 73) |
False-positive rate (1 – specificity) (%) | 24 (9, 45) | 0 |
Positive predictive value (%) | 74 (52, 90) | 100 (69, 100) |
Negative predictive value (%) | 79 (58, 93) | 71 (54, 85) |
Values in parentheses are 95% exact confidence intervals. The analysis included 50 patients: 22 with an imaging complete response (2 with residual disease at vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) and 20 with a complete response at VABB included in primary analysis) and 28 with residual disease at postneoadjuvant therapy imaging. *Three patients had missing information on MRI. †Five patients had missing information on PET.