Table 4.
Comparison of perioperative professionals’ prioritization voting in high-income countries, ranked by clinicians’ perceived feasibility
Feasibility | Safety concerns | Unintended consequences | |
---|---|---|---|
Introduce recycling* | 76.0 | 4.2 | 6.7 |
Reduce the use and wastage of anaesthetic gases§ | 71.9 | 10.1 | 12.2 |
Ensure appropriate use of clinical waste* | 69.7 | 4.2 | 6.0 |
Reduce consumables used† | 68.7 | 9.1 | 11.1 |
Reduce energy and water use* | 68.3 | 8.9 | 9.9 |
Reduce the impact of surgical fumes‡ | 68.2 | 6.2 | 8.8 |
Make more use of lightly packaged consumables† | 64.3 | 6.0 | 7.8 |
Increase use of consumables that can be easily recycled† | 60.7 | 7.5 | 9.2 |
Streamline theatre processes* | 57.2 | 6.8 | 7.8 |
Reduced general anaesthesia used, increased local/regional anaesthesia§ | 55.2 | 10.1 | 14.9 |
Introduce surgical devices that can be reused† | 53.2 | 12.6 | 14.0 |
Reduce impact of personal protective equipment (PPE)* | 53.0 | 11.7 | 13.4 |
Introduce reusable surgical gowns and drapes* | 46.2 | 16.4 | 18.9 |
Introduce re-sterilization and reuse of single-use consumables† | 33.6 | 29.9 | 28.4 |
Reduce the use of gases for minimally invasive surgery¶ | 32.2 | 26.0 | 22.4 |
Values are percentages. *Responses from all participants. †Responses from surgeons, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners, and theatre managers/stores only. ‡Responses from surgeons and theatre nurses only. §Responses from anaesthetists and anaesthetic nurses only. ¶Responses from surgeons only.