Table 1.
Characteristics of the comparative studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis
Reference | Data accrual | SLNB procedures | SPIO | Injection volume (ml) | Injection site | Timing of injection | MINORS score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Douek et al.3 | Prospective, non-randomized | 160 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 23 |
Thill et al.4 | Prospective, non-randomized | 150 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 22 |
Rubio et al.36‡ | Prospective, non-randomized | 30 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 20 |
Rubio et al.5 | Prospective, non-randomized | 120 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 23 |
Piñeiro-Madrona et al.6 | Prospective, non-randomized | 181 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Ghilli et al.7 | Prospective, non-randomized | 197 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Coufal et al.8 | Prospective, non-randomized | 20 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 20 |
Ahmed et al.37 | Prospective, non-randomized | 32 | Sienna+® | 0.5 ml SPIO | Peritumoral | Peroperative | 21 |
Houpeau et al.9 | Prospective, non-randomized | 108 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Karakatsanis et al.10 | Prospective, non-randomized | 206 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Karakatsanis et al.11* | Prospective, non-randomized | 339 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar/peritumoral | Peroperative/preoperative | 24 |
Karakatsanis et al.20 | Prospective, non-randomized | 12 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Preoperative | 22 |
Karakatsanis et al.19§ | Prospective, non-randomized | 40 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO | Subareolar/peritumoral | Preoperative | 24 |
Alvarado et al.16 | Prospective, non-randomized | 146 | Magtrace® | 2 ml SPIO | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Taruno et al.38† | Prospective, non-randomized | 210 | Ferucarbutran | 1 ml SPIO | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Makita et al.42† | Prospective, non-randomized | 69 | Ferucarbutran | 0.5 ml SPIO | Subareolar/peritumoral | Peroperative | 22 |
Hamzah et al.39 | Prospective, non-randomized | 20 | Magtrace® | 2 ml SPIO | Subareolar | Peroperative | 20 |
Rubio et al.17 | Prospective, randomized | 135 | Magtrace® | SPIO in different doses | Subareolar | Peroperative | 24 |
Hersi et al.18 | Prospective, non-randomized | 328 | Magtrace® | SPIO in different doses | Subareolar/peritumoral | Peroperative/preoperative | 24 |
Giménez-Climent et al.40‡ | Prospective, non-randomized | 89 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar | Peroperative | 22 |
Wärnberg et al.41¶ | Prospective, observational | 340 | Sienna+® | 2 ml SPIO diluted in 3 ml NaCl or local anaesthetic | Subareolar/peritumoral | Peroperative/preoperative | 20 |
Head-to-head comparison between superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and radioisotope. All other studies had a within-patient comparison design—all patients received both tracers ± blue dye and paired comparisons were made. †Used Tokyo probe; the Sentimag® system (Endomag, Cambridge, UK) was used in all other studies. ‡Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant treatment. §Delayed SLNB after primary surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (SentiNot study). ¶Reported only skin-staining outcomes. MINORS, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Sienna+® (Endomag, Campbridge, UK); Magtrace® (Endomag, Cambridge, UK).