Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;110(4):410–419. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac426

Table 3.

Subgroup and meta-regression analysis examining factors for successful superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle-guided sentinel lymph node detection

Subgroup analysis Meta-regression analysis
Risk ratio P Coefficient b P
Probe
ȃSentimag® 1.007 (0.994, 1.019) 0.289
ȃTokyo probe 1.003 (0.924, 1.088) 0.941
SPIO
ȃFerucarbutran 1.003 (0.924, 1.088) 0.941
ȃMagtrace® 1.010 (0.992, 1.029) 0.277
ȃSienna + ® 1.004 (0.988, 1.021) 0.598
Injection site –0.0083 (–0.0663, 0.0498)* 0.781
ȃSubareolar 1.000 (0.991, 1.010) 0.957
ȃPeritumoral 1.118 (0.982, 1.272) 0.091
Timing of injection 0.0544 (0.0042, 0.1045)† 0.034
ȃPeroperative 0.999 (0.990, 1.008) 0.819
ȃPreoperative 1.116 (1.020, 1.222) 0.017
Setting
ȃAfter neoadjuvant therapy 1.021 (0.975, 1.069) 0.375
ȃUpfront 1.005 (0.992, 1.018) 0.442
Comparison
ȃPaired 1.007 (0.995, 1.020) 0.251
ȃUnpaired 0.956 (0.893, 1.024) 0.197
Subgroup –0.3627 (–0.5967, –0.1287)‡ 0.002
ȃStandard SLNB 1.002 (0.993, 1.011) 0.661
ȃDelayed SLNB 1.528 (1.216, 1.922) < 0.001
Injection volume (ml)
ȃ0.5 1.032 (0.981, 1.086) 0.227
ȃ1.0 1.016 (0.968, 1.067) 0.522
ȃ1.5 0.988 (0.959, 1.017) 0.407
ȃ2.0 1.042 (0.974, 1.115) 0.231
ȃ5.0 1.000 (0.988, 1.013) 0.959

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Coefficient for *subareolar injection, †preoperative injection or ‡standard sentinel lymph node dissection. SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy.