Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 23;110(4):410–419. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac426

Table 5.

Subgroup and meta-regression analysis for rate difference (concordance – reverse concordance)

Subgroup analysis Meta-regression analysis
Rate difference P Coefficient b P
Probe
ȃSentimag® −0.002 (−0.009, 0.004) 0.502
ȃTokyo probe −0.004 (−0.084, 0.076) 0.922
SPIO
ȃFerucarbutran −0.004 (−0.084, 0.076) 0.922
ȃMagtrace® −0.010 (−0.022, 0.001) 0.078
ȃSienna+® −0.004 (−0.021, 0.013) 0.642
Injection site
ȃPeritumoral −0.120 (−0.020, 0.063) 0.099
ȃSubareolar 0.001 (−0.006, 0.007) 0.846
Timing of injection −0.0558 (−0.0904, −0.0212)* 0.002
ȃPreoperative −0.122 (−0.219, −0.025) 0.014
ȃPeroperative 0.001 (−0.005, 0.008) 0.655
Setting
ȃUpfront −0.002 (−0.009, 0.004) 0.454
ȃAfter neoadjuvant therapy 0.021 (−0.020, 0.063) 0.312
Subgroup 0.2957 (0.1440, 0.4473)† <0.001
ȃStandard SLNB −0.0001 (−0.007, 0.006) 0.890
ȃDelayed SLNB −0.350 (−0.498, −0.202) <0.001
Injection volume (ml)
ȃ0.5 −0.035 (−0.080, 0.011) 0.132
ȃ1.0 −0.016 (−0.067, 0.034) 0.524
ȃ1.5 0.011 (−0.022, 0.044) 0.516
ȃ2.0 −0.011 (−0.024, 0.003) 0.121
ȃ5.0 −0.001 (−0.007, 0.010) 0.518

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Coefficient for *preoperative injection or †standard sentinel lymph node dissection. SPIO, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; SLNB, sentinel lymph node biopsy.