Table 2.
Model 1 total model | Model 2 model by externalizing status | Model 3 models by externalizing status and gender | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Girls | Boys | ||||||
Total sample N = 939 | Ext n = 96 | No Ext N = 843 | Ext n = 63 | No Ext N = 405 | Ext n = 33 | No Ext N = 438 | |
Gender-based discrimination | .02 | −.13 | .07 | −.13 | .13* | −.07 | −.04 |
Race/ethnicity-based discrimination | .13** | .17 | .14** | .00 | .13* | .57** | −.17** |
Sexual orientation-based discrimination | .13** | .30* | .01 | .53** | .09 | .03 | −.03 |
Gender (referent girl) | .00 | −.04 | .04 | ||||
Race/ethnicity (referent white) | −.04 | −.19 | −.01 | .00 | .06 | −.28 | −.06 |
Sexual minority (heterosexual referent) | .06 | −.04 | .03 | .00 | .13* | −.30 | −.06 |
Maternal education | −.06 | .31** | −.09* | .20 | −.04 | .31* | −.06 |
R2 | .06** | .26** | .04** | .33** | .08** | .60** | .04 |
Model 1: X2 = 65.87, df = 14, p < .00, RMSEA = .06 CI [.05, .08], CFI = .92
Model 2: Externalizing problems X2 = 23.23, No externalizing problems X2 = 63.56, df = 30, p < .01, RMSEA = .06 CI [.05, .08], CFI = .90
Model 3: Girls Externalizing problems X2 = 25.50; Girls no externalizing problems X2 = 46.16; Boys externalizing problems X2 = 20.12, Boys no externalizing problems X2 = 32.57, df = 54, p < .01, RMSEA = .07 CI (.06, .09), CFI = .89
Ext above the cut-off for externalizing problems, No Ext below the cut-off for externalizing problems
p < .01,
p < .05