Table 2.
Comparison of F1-score obtained with different classifiers and with different types of input data and modalities assessed on a single fold of the dataset.
| F1-score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Input | Modality | Random forest | DenseNet121 | EfficientNet-B3 |
| Image | ceT1 | – | 0.52 | 0.47 |
| hrT2 | – | 0.41 | 0.37 | |
| ceT1+hrT2 | – | 0.51 | 0.31 | |
| VS segmentation | ceT1 | – | 0.86 | 0.64 |
| hrT2 | – | 0.88 | 0.66 | |
| ceT1+hrT2 | – | 0.89 | 0.64 | |
| Image + | ceT1 | – | 0.89 | 0.76 |
| segmentation of | hrT2 | – | 0.87 | 0.65 |
| VS and adjacent | ceT1+hrT2 | – | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| structures | ||||
| Segmentation of | ceT1 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.89 |
| VS and adjacent | hrT2 | 0.93 | 0.88 | 0.88 |
| structures | ceT1+hrT2 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.83 |