Table 3.
Ablation analysis results of the proposed method on the BraTS2018 validation data.
| Dice score (DSC) | 95% Hausdorff distance (H95) ↓ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT (%) | TC (%) | ET (%) | Overall (%) | WT (mm) | TC (mm) | ET (mm) | Overall (mm) | |
| 3D UNet | 90.79 | 86.12 | 78.95 | 85.28 | 4.40 | 7.12 | 2.93 | 4.82 |
| 3D MI-UNet | 91.02 | 85.86 | 78.97 | 85.28 | 4.12 | 6.82 | 3.18 | 4.70 |
| Joint 3D+2D MI-UNet | 90.92 | 85.49 | 76.53 | 84.30 | 3.76 | 7.32 | 3.03 | 4.71 |
| Ensemble | 91.03 | 86.44 | 78.95 | 85.47 | 3.76 | 6.73 | 2.93 | 4.47 |
| Ensemble+post-processing | 91.03 | 86.44 | 80.58 | 86.02 | 3.76 | 6.73 | 2.51 | 4.33 |
Bold numbers are the best values.