Table 4.
Ablation analysis results of the proposed method on the BraTS2020 training data via five-fold cross validation.
| Dice score (DSC) | 95% Hausdorff distance (H95) ↓ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT (%) | TC (%) | ET (%) | Overall (%) | WT (mm) | TC (mm) | ET (mm) | Overall (mm) | |
| 3D UNet | 91.48 | 87.35 | 78.87 | 85.90 | 6.39 | 7.18 | 26.40 | 13.32 |
| 3D MI-UNet | 91.66 | 87.37 | 79.21 | 86.08 | 5.64 | 5.63 | 21.90 | 11.06 |
| Joint 3D+2D MI-UNet | 91.38 | 87.10 | 77.31 | 85.24 | 4.70 | 4.64 | 27.91 | 12.42 |
| Ensemble | 91.72 | 87.55 | 79.20 | 86.16 | 4.67 | 4.55 | 21.90 | 10.37 |
| Ensemble+post-processing | 91.72 | 87.55 | 81.75 | 87.01 | 4.67 | 4.55 | 22.94 | 10.72 |
Bold numbers are the best values.