Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 24;2:856460. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2022.856460

Table 5.

Comparison results of different models.

Input data type Models Acc AUC
Clinical data only Clinical model (32) 76.03% ± 10.0 0.753 ± 0.13
Image data only Radiomics model (48) 67.04% ± 4.9 0.640 ± 0.03
WANG et al.'s Model (32) 69.5% ± 5.1 0.723 ± 0.06
SENet-like model (34) 64.5% ± 3.4 0.675 ± 0.06
CBAM-like model (35) 66.7% ± 4.2 0.684 ± 0.05
Propose DPA model 70.7% ± 2.4 0.747 ± 0.03
Clinical data and Image data WANG et al.'s fusion model (33) 80.49% ± 4.3 0.833 ± 0.03
Propose DPA fusion model 81.2% ±1.3 0.869 ±0.03

Acc, accuracy; AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. The bold values indicate P values < 0.05 are highlighted. The bold values indicate the best results.