Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 30;25:e47479. doi: 10.2196/47479

Table 1.

Summarized results as measured by the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool.


Gallstone disease score (total=16) Acute/chronic pancreatitis score (total=19) Cirrhosis/portal hypertension score (total=15) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma score (total=17) Hepatocellular carcinoma score (total=14)
Content Data

Initial definition of which subjects will be covered 0 0 0 0 0

Coverage of the previously defined subjects (N/Aa if the answer is “no” for item 1) 0 0 0 0 0

Description of the medical problem, treatment, or procedure 1 1 1 1 1

Definition of the purpose of the interventions 1 1 1 0 1

Description of treatment alternatives (conservative management) 0 1 1 1 1

Description of the sequence of the interventions and surgical procedure 0 0 0 1 0

Description of the qualitative benefits for the patient 0 1 1 1 1

Description of the quantitative benefits to the patient 0 1 1 1 1

Description of the qualitative risks and complications 1 1 0 1 0

Description of the quantitative risks and complications 1 1 1 1 0

Addressing quality-of-life issues 1 1 1 1 1

Description of how complications are handled 1 1 0 1 1

Description of the precautions that the patient may take 1 1 0 0 1

Mention of alert signs that the patient may detect 1 1 1 1 0

Addressing medical intervention costs and insurance issues 0 1 0 0 0

Specific contact details for hospital services (N/A if not hospitals) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Specific details of other sources of reliable information/support 1 1 1 1 0

Coverage of all relevant issues for the topic (summary item for all content criteria) 1 1 1 0 1

Total for content data 10 14 10 11 9
Date of issue or revision

Date of issue or revision 1 1 1 1 1

Logo of the issuing body 0 0 0 0 0

Names of the persons or entities that produced the document 0 0 0 0 0

Names of the persons or entities that financed the document 0 0 0 0 0

Short bibliography of the evidence-based data used in the document 0 0 0 0 0

Statement about whether and how patients were involved/consulted in the document’s production 0 0 0 0 0

Total for date of issue or revision 1 1 1 1 1
Structure data

Use of everyday language and explanation of complex words or jargon 0 0 0 0 0

Use of generic names for all medications or products (N/A if no medications described) 1 N/A N/A 1 N/A

Use of short sentences (<15 words on average) 0 0 0 0 0

Personal address to the reader 0 0 0 0 0

Respectful tone 1 1 1 1 1

Clear information (no ambiguities or contradictions) 0 0 0 0 0

Balanced information on risks and benefits 1 1 1 1 1

Presentation of information in a logical order 0 0 0 0 0

Satisfactory design and layout (excluding figures or graphs; see next item) 1 1 1 1 1

Clear and relevant figures or graphs (N/A if absent) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Inclusion of a named space for the reader’s notes or questions 1 1 1 1 1

Inclusion of a printed consent form contrary to recommendations (N/A if not from hospitals) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Total for structure data 5 4 4 5 4

aN/A: not applicable.