Table 2.
Hypothetical views on what participants would want from the study in the future.
| Future studies | ADHDa group (n=10), n (%) | Comparison group (n=12), n (%) | Total (n=22), n (%) | ||||||
| Willingness | |||||||||
|
|
Positive about using the system for 1 or 2 years |
|
8 (80) | 10 (83) | 18 (82) | ||||
| Sharing data with general practitioners | |||||||||
|
|
Acceptable | 5 (50) | 11 (92) | 16 (73) | |||||
|
|
|
Benefit their care | 6 (60) | 7 (58) | 13 (59) | ||||
|
|
|
Access to objective data |
|
2 (20) | 4 (33) | 6 (27) | |||
|
|
|
Real-time access |
|
2 (20) | 1 (8) | 3 (14) | |||
|
|
|
Taking action |
|
5 (50) | 5 (43) | 10 (45) | |||
|
|
Questioned whether all RMTb data are relevant |
|
5 (50) | 1 (8) | 6 (27) | ||||
|
|
Choice |
|
3 (30) | 3 (25) | 6 (27) | ||||
| Improvements needed | |||||||||
|
|
Feedback | ||||||||
|
|
|
Wanted more feedback |
|
4 (40) | 2 (17) | 6 (27) | |||
|
|
|
Visual feedback |
|
4 (40) | 5 (42) | 9 (41) | |||
|
|
|
Verbal feedback |
|
2 (20) | 1 (8) | 3 (14) | |||
|
|
|
Feedback on active data |
|
5 (50) | 3 (25) | 8 (36) | |||
|
|
|
Feedback on passive data |
|
3 (30) | 7 (58) | 10 (45) | |||
|
|
|
During study period |
|
2 (20) | 2 (17) | 4 (18) | |||
|
|
|
End of study |
|
4 (40) | 5 (42) | 9 (41) | |||
|
|
More information |
|
4 (40) | 1 (8) | 5 (23) | ||||
|
|
Passive monitoring |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Passive app syncing issues |
|
3 (30) | 5 (42) | 8 (36) | |||
|
|
|
Using own phone |
|
3 (30) | 2 (17) | 5 (23) | |||
|
|
Cognitive tasks |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Shortening the length |
|
5 (50) | 2 (17) | 7 (32) | |||
|
|
|
Less frequent |
|
3 (30) | 2 (17) | 5 (23) | |||
aADHD: attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
bRMT: remote measurement technology.