Table 4.
Interpretation evaluation for Simulation A-F. The correlation score and p-value for calculating the MIP-TPO is Pearson correlation coefficient, the p value for all simulation is lower than . MIP, model interpretation power; TPO, temporal pattern occurrences; CDM: class difference map.
| Simulation No. | MIP-TPO | MIP-CDM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Negative Class | Positive Class | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
| S-A | - | 0.40* | 100% | 94.4% |
| S-B | - | 0.89* | 100% | 100% |
| S-C | - | 0.59* | 100% | 94.4% |
| S-D | 0.53* | −0.35* | 100% | 100% |
| S-E | 0.57* | 0.80* | 100% | 100% |
| S-F | - | 0.22* | 100% | 100% |
p – value