Table 2.
Characteristics of excluded studies.
Study ID | Reasons for exclusion |
---|---|
Balogun et al. 2012 [24] | The study population was not pregnant women with triplex infection but consisted of adult 102 (32 males and 70 females) Nigerian HIV infected patients attending the antiretroviral therapy clinics |
| |
Nnakenyi et al. 2020 [5] | The study population was not pregnant women but consisted of 4663 (3024 women and 1639 men) adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with confirmed HIV seropositivity by double ELISA and western blot, who underwent serology testing for both HBsAg and anti-HCV as part of their baseline tests, at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Nigeria |
| |
Forbi et al. 2007 [6] | The study population was not pregnant women with triplex infection but consisted of a cohort of people (83 males and 97 females) living with HIV/AIDS in North-Central Nigeria |
| |
Hamza et al. 2013 [25] | The study population was not pregnant women but consisted of four-hundred and forty (178 males and 262 females) consecutive HIV-positive individuals seen at the adult HIV clinic in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital (AKTH), Kano, North-Western Nigeria |
| |
Ogwu-Richard et al. 2015 [26] | The study population was not pregnant but consisted of 183 (100 females and 83 males) HIV-positive persons 15 years of age and above |
| |
Otegbayo et al. 2008 [27] | The study population was not pregnant but on eligible HIV-positive treatment-naive patients who presented between August 2004 and February 2007 to the University College Hospital (UCH), Ibadan, Nigeria |
| |
Tremeau-Bravard et al. 2012 [28] | The study population was not pregnant women but consisted of 443 (244 women and 199 men) antiretroviral naïve HIV-positive individuals seen at our Gede Foundation clinic in Abuja, Nigeria for HIV/AIDS related infection |