Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 24;41(8):872–881. doi: 10.1007/s11604-023-01410-5

Table 5.

Comparison of image noise (SD) between FDM and HDM

Ventricle Cerebrum
FDM HDM P value FDM HDM P value
Mean ± SD 1 < year 2.2 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.7  < 0.05 3.0 ± 0.6 4.1 ± 1.0  < 0.05
1 to  < 5 years 2.7 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.6 < 0.05 3.5 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.9  < 0.05
5 to  < 10 years 2.5 ± 0.4 3.7 ± 0.8  < 0.05 3.5 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 0.7  < 0.05
10 to  < 15 years 2.9 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.8  < 0.05 3.2 ± 0.7 4.5 ± 0.6  < 0.05
All age 2.6 ± 0.6 3.4 ± 0.7  < 0.05 3.3 ± 0.6 4.3 ± 0.8 < 0.05
Brain stem  Cerebellum
FDM HDM P value FDM HDM P value
 < 1 year 3.2 ± 0.8 3.8 ± 0.8  < 0.05 3.0 ± 0.8 3.6 ± 0.8  < 0.05
1 to  < 5 years 3.6 ± 0.6 4.5 ± 0.7  < 0.05 3.1 ± 0.5 4.3 ± 0.7  < 0.05
5 to  < 10 years 3.3 ± 0.6 4.6 ± 0.6  < 0.05 3.4 ± 0.7 4.0 ± 0.6  < 0.05
10 to  < 15 years 3.7 ± 0.8 4.7 ± 0.9  < 0.05 3.2 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.7  < 0.05
All age 3.5 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 0.8  < 0.05 3.2 ± 0.7 4.1 ± 0.8 < 0.05

FDM full-dose method, HDM half-dose method, SD standard deviation