Table 2.

Gradients of the relationships between shear stiffness $B_{\mathit{n}\mathit{s}}$ and various LV functions in the healthy and HCM LV geometries at various helix angle configuration

Transmural angle difference (${}^{\circ }$)	Transmurally averaged angle (${}^{\circ }$)	Gradient with respect to shear stiffness $B_{\mathit{n}\mathit{s}}$
		EF (%)	SV (ml)	Peak systolic pressure (mmHg)	Maximal fiber stress (kPa)
Healthy LV
80	0	− 0.104	− 0.41	− 0.446	− 0.384
120	− 20	− 0.144	− 0.462	− 0.400	− 0.420
120	− 10	− 0.150	− 0.492	− 0.422	− 0.406
120	0	− 0.160	− 0.532	− 0.492	− 0.414
120	10	− 0.172	− 0.572	− 0.526	− 0.438
120	20	− 0.188	− 0.618	− 0.554	− 0.464
160	0	− 0.140	− 0.550	− 0.490	− 0.686

Transmural angle (${}^{\circ }$)	Average angle (${}^{\circ }$)	Gradients with respect to shear stiffness $B_{\mathit{n}\mathit{s}}$
		EF (%)	SV (ml)	Peak systolic pressure (mmHg)	Maximal fiber stress (kPa)
HCM LV
80	0	− 0.344	− 1.128	− 1.346	− 0.476
120	− 20	− 0.502	− 1.298	− 1.374	− 0.464
120	0	− 0.592	− 1.550	− 1.564	− 0.530
120	20	− 0.702	− 1.806	− 1.770	− 0.596
160	0	− 0.662	− 1.776	− 1.650	− 0.576