Skip to main content
. 2023 May 6;22(4):1313–1332. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01721-6

Table 3.

Gradients of the relationships between shear stiffness Bns and various LV functions in HCM and DCM at different settings

LV geometry FE simulation settings Gradient
EF
(%)
SV (ml) Peak systolic pressure (mmHg) Maximal fiber stress (kPa)
Normal Healthy settings − 0.160 − 0.532 − 0.492 − 0.414
HCM Healthy settings − 0.194 − 0.552 − 0.454 − 0.134
HCM Healthy settings, but EDP increased from 5 to 7 mmHg − 0.208 − 0.576 − 0.488 − 0.142
HCM Healthy settings, but epi:endo helix angle configuration changed from − 60°:60° to − 51.4°:60o − 0.190 − 0.546 − 0.478 − 0.130
HCM Healthy settings, but diastolic sheetlet angle changed from 18° to 48o − 0.562 − 1.494 − 1.488 − 0.524
HCM Disease settings − 0.572 − 1.508 − 1.526 − 0.556
DCM Healthy settings − 0.016 − 0.178 − 0.140 − 0.160
DCM Disease settings − 0.018 − 0.180 − 0.130 − 0.140