Skip to main content
. 2023 May 6;22(4):1313–1332. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01721-6

Table 7.

Gradients of the relationships between shear stiffness Bns and various LV functions at different active tension and global stiffness values in HCM (Fig. 11) and DCM (Fig. 12)

LV geometry Active tension and global stiffness Gradient
EF
(%)
SV (ml) Peak systolic pressure (mmHg) Maximal fiber stress (kPa)
HCM T0 150 kPa, C 100 Pa − 0.572 − 1.508 − 1.526 − 0.556
HCM T0 105 kPa, C 100 Pa − 0.522 − 1.446 − 1.342 − 0.526
HCM T0 150 kPa, C 200 Pa − 0.682 − 1.520 − 1.688 − 0.536
HCM T0 105 kPa, C 200 Pa − 0.646 − 1.462 − 1.460 − 0.508
HCM T0 75 kPa, C 300 Pa − 0.644 − 1.306 − 1.284 − 0.458
DCM T0 150 kPa, C 100 Pa − 0.020 − 0.198 − 0.154 − 0.190
DCM T0 105 kPa, C 100 Pa 0.012 − 0.166 − 0.108 − 0.234
DCM T0 150 kPa, C 200 Pa − 0.060 − 0.334 − 0.266 − 0.282
DCM T0 105 kPa, C 200 Pa − 0.016 − 0.248 − 0.180 − 0.296