Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 28;37(11):2265–2271. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02328-4

Table 2.

The results of multivariable linear regression analysis in patients with williams syndrome and control subjectsa.

Iris grading
Grade I Grade II Grade III
β Coefficient (95% CI) P Value β Coefficient (95% CI) P Value β Coefficient (95% CI) P Value
LogMAR BCVA 0.03 [−0.06–0.11] 0.543 0.03 [−0.06–0.12] 0.472 0.02 [−0.07–0.11] 0.693
Vessel Density −2.67 [−4.97–−0.38] 0.024 −3.52 [−6.57–−0.47] 0.025 0.17 [−2.63–2.96] 0.905
Vessel Density-Fovea −7.20 [−12.41–−2.00] 0.008 −10.20 [−17.12–−3.27] 0.005 −2.15 [−8.48–4.19] 0.496
Foveal Avascular Zone 0.11 [0.01–0.21] 0.033 0.20 [0.07–0.34] 0.005 0.03 [−0.10–0.16] 0.586
Central Macular Thickness −17.29 [−31.48–−3.11] 0.018 −29.46 [−44.26–−14.66] <0.001 −21.68 [−37.08–−6.28] 0.007
Fovea Upper Width 98.35 [34.58–162.11] 0.003 127.08 [57.07–197.10] 0.001 36.96 [−32.22–106.15] 0.288
Fovea Lower Width 128.69 [80.60–176.77] <0.001 132.91 [80.12–185.71] <0.001 84.30 [32.13–136.47] 0.002
Arterial Outer Diameter −17.04 [−24.26–−9.82] <0.001 −7.48 [−15.31–0.36] 0.061 −20.04 [−27.72–−12.36] <0.001
Arterial Inner Diameter −15.55 [−22.09–−9.00] <0.001 −6.26 [−13.37–0.84] 0.082 −18.16 [−25.13–−11.19] <0.001
Arterial Vessel Wall −0.81 [−1.75–0.14] 0.091 −0.85 [−1.87–0.18] 0.102 −0.93 [−1.93–0.08] 0.069
Venous Outer Diameter −11.00 [−18.73–−3.26] 0.007 −9.39 [−18.60–−0.17] 0.046 −21.84 [−30.89–−12.80] <0.001
Venous Inner Diameter −12.77 [−21.21–−4.33] 0.004 −7.47 [−17.53–2.59] 0.141 −26.05 [−35.93–−16.18] <0.001
Venous Vessel Wall 1.01 [−0.37–2.39] 0.147 −0.73 [−2.37–0.91] 0.373 0.66 [−0.96–2.27] 0.413

logMAR logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, CI confidence interval.

aAdjusting for Age and Gender, subjects with iris grade 0 were used as controls.