Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;14:4452. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40142-y

Fig. 4. Shark is required in glial cells for cross-neuron plasticity.

Fig. 4

ah NMJs of MN4-Ib in third instar larvae of non-ablated and Is ablated larvae in control, glia shark knockdown, muscle shark knockdown, and double knockdown backgrounds, labeled with GFP (green) and HRP (magenta). NMJ expansion was observed upon Is MN ablation (b), which is blocked by glia shark knockdown (d) or double knockdown (h). i Cartoon representation of a dissected larva (pink) and a hemisegment highlighted by dashed red rectangle. The target muscle examined in this figure is shown in blue. Cartoon is generated with Biorender. j Quantification of MN4-Ib bouton number in non-ablated and Is ablated larvae in control, glial shark knockdown, muscle shark knockdown, and double knockdown backgrounds. Control (N = 22 and 23 NMJs), t(43) = 3.598, p = 0.0008, unpaired t test, two-tailed. Glial shark knockdown (N = 21 and 22 NMJs), t(41) = 1.566, p = 0.1250, unpaired t test, two-tailed. Muscle shark knockdown (N = 23 and 19 NMJs), t(40) = 3.220, p = 0.0025, unpaired t test, two-tailed. Double shark knockdown (N = 16 and 22 NMJs), t(36) = 0.3390, p = 0.7366, unpaired t test, two-tailed. k Quantification of normalized EPSP of Is ablated larvae in control, glia shark knockdown, muscle shark knockdown, and double knockdown backgrounds. F(3, 71) = 5.533, p = 0.0018, One-way ANOVA. Is ablated control vs glia shark knockdown, p = 0.0062. Is ablated control vs muscle shark knockdown, p = 0.0105. Is ablated control vs double knockdown, p = 0.0093. Is ablated control vs Ib/Ib+Is, t(28.04) = 4.485, p = 0.0001, unpaired t test, two-tailed, with Welch’s correction. Is ablated in glia shark knockdown vs Ib/Ib+Is, t(30) = 2.798, p = 0.0089, unpaired t test, two-tailed. Is ablated in muscle shark knockdown vs Ib/Ib+Is, t(30) = 2.329, p = 0.0268, unpaired t test, two-tailed. Is ablated in double knockdown vs Ib/Ib+Is, t(25) = 2.254, p = 0.0332, unpaired t test, two-tailed. l Quantification of normalized quantal content of Is ablated larvae in control, glia shark knockdown, muscle shark knockdown, and double knockdown backgrounds. F(3, 71) = 4.437, p = 0.0065, One-way ANOVA. Is ablated control vs glia shark knockdown, p = 0.0466. Is ablated control vs muscle shark knockdown, p = 0.9470. Is ablated control vs double knockdown, p = 0.0214. For (k, l), N (NMJs) = 20, 20, 20, 15. Error bars indicate ± SEM, ns = non-significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.