Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;13:11926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39173-8

Table 3.

Comparison of similarity score among the wild-type, − 530 Gγ (A>G), and − 533 to − 529 Gγ (-ATAAG) sequences using the online TFBIND program for prediction of GATA related transcription factors binding affinity.

AC ID from TRANSFAC R.3.4 Name of the binding factor Consensus sequence Wild type − 530 Gγ (A>G) (this study) − 533 to − 529 Gγ (-ATAAG)33
M00075 V$GATA1_01 GATA-1 (GATA-binding factor 1) SNNGATNNNN 0.805035 0.870188  < 0.77
M00126 V$GATA1_02 GATA-1 (GATA-binding factor 1) NNNNNGATANKGNN 0.863125 0.875312  < 0.77
M00127 V$GATA1_03 GATA-1 (GATA-binding factor 1) RNSNNGATAANNGN 0.788829  < 0.78  < 0.78
M00128 V$GATA1_04 GATA-1 (GATA-binding factor 1) NNCWGATARNNNN 0.865502 0.849877  < 0.81
M00076 V$GATA2_01 GATA-2 (GATA-2; GATA-box binding factor 2; GATA2; NF-E1b (chick)) NNNGATRNNN 0.853406 0.904826  < 0.78
M00077 V$GATA3_01 GATA-3 (GATA-binding factor 3) NNGATARNG 0.887461 0.915817  < 0.82
M00203 V$GATA_C GATA-X (GATA binding site) NGATAAGNMNN 0.967071 0.924511  < 0.83

S = C or G, W = A or T, R = A or G, Y = C or T, K = G or T, M = A or C, N = any base pair.