Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 17;87(6):1862–1879. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01779-4

Table 3.

Correlations of response time-based measures of flexibility/stability and resilience questionnaires

CD-RISC RS-25 BRS
Affective flexibility task (N = 99)
Switch costs emotion → gender rs = − 0.23, p = 0.01 rs = − 0.22, p = 0.01 rs = − 0.15, p = 0.07
Switch costs gender → emotion rs = − 0.31, p = 0.001 rs = − 0.30, p = 0.001 rs = − 0.23 p = 0.01
Cognitive flexibility task
Switch costs (N = 94) rs = − 0.20, p = 0.03 rs = − 0.13, p = 0.11 rs = − 0.17, p = 0.047
Distractor inhibition costs (N = 91) rs = 0.11, p = 0.16 rs = 0.07, p = 0.25 rs = 0.01, p = 0.45
Spontaneous switching (N = 83) rs = 0.06, p = 0.29 rs = − 0.03, p = 0.40 rs = − 0.08, p = 0.23

All tests are one-sided. Statistically significant results (based on critical p-values determined using Dubey–Armitage–Parmar correction for three endpoints; see Methods section for details) are printed in bold. CD-RISC = Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale; RS-25 = Resilience Scale; BRS = Brief Resilience Scale.