Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 8;9(7):e18117. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18117

Table 1.

Characteristics of the respondents determining their Cognitive Impairment status (n = 200).

Characteristics Number of participants, n (%) Level of Cognitive Impairment
Normal, n (%) Mild/Moderate/Severe, n (%) 2/p-value (≤0.05)
Age Group (In Years)
 ≤70 128 (64) 19 (9.5) 109 (54.5) 7.36/0.03*
 >70 72 (36) 20 (10) 52 (26)
Gender
 Male 101 (50.5) 29 (14.5) 72 (36) 38.12/0.01*
 Female 99 (49.5) 10 (5) 89 (44.5)
Education
 Non-formal Education 72 (36) 2 (1) 70 (35) 91.82/0.01*
 ≤Primary 15 (7.5) 1 (0.5) 14 (7)
 ≤Secondary 24 (12) 3 (1.5) 21 (10.5)
 ≥Higher Secondary 89 (44.5) 33 (16.5) 56 (28)
Past Occupation
 Service holder 94 (47) 32 (16) 62 (31) 74.26/0.01*
 Housewife 80 (40) 5 (2.5) 75 (37.5)
 Businessman 26 (13) 2 (1) 24 (12)
Reasons for Staying at Old Home
 Self-desire 66 (33) 25 (12.5) 41 (20.5) 75.26/0.01*
 Children Choice 112 (56) 5 (2.5) 107 (53.5)
 No shelter/Others 22 (11) 9 (4.5) 13 (6.5)
Difficulties with Manipulation (Physical Disability)
 Yes 18 (9.3) 8 (4.1) 10 (5.2) 19.39/0.01*
 No 175 (90.7) 30 (15.5) 145 (75.1)

Data are presented as frequency (n), percentage (%); *Statistical significance at p-value ≤ 0.05. Chi-square test was used to observe the association.