Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 8;15:e00455. doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2023.e00455

Fig. 19.

Fig. 19

Checkpoint 3 results from Claremont ALFRD (n = 12) and SALAD (n = 13): Imaging results from (A) Claremont, (B) SALAD; Comparison between Claremont and SALAD in (C) bandwidth, (D) average signal intensity and (E) SNR; (F) Table showing descriptive statistics (Mean ± Std) of Claremont and SALAD in bandwidth and mean signal intensity; Comparison between Claremont and SALAD in (G) pixel densitometry; (H) Assembly of the lateral flow wick; (I) Table showing descriptive statistics (Mean ± Std) of Claremont and SALAD in pixel densitometry’s kurtosis and skewness, and their SNR.