TABLE 4.
Ranking of each intervention on body fat percentage.
| SUCRA, % | Rank*, % | Mean rank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 0.2 | 0.0 | 7.0 |
| AE-M | 58.7 | 7.5 | 3.5 |
| AE-HI | 50.6 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| RT-M | 45.9 | 8.5 | 4.2 |
| RT-HI | 55.5 | 14.4 | 3.7 |
| COM-M | 76.0 | 41.9 | 2.4 |
| COM-HI | 63.1 | 23.4 | 3.2 |
SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve. *Rank probability ranges from 0 to 100, where higher value indicates best intervention and lower value indicates worst intervention. AE-M, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise; AE-HI, high-intensity aerobic exercise; RT-M, moderate-intensity resistance exercise; RT-HI, high-intensity resistance exercise; COM-M, moderate-intensity combined exercise; COM-HI, high-intensity combined exercise; CON, blank controls.