TABLE 8.
Ranking of each intervention on fat mass.
| SUCRA, % | Rank*, % | Mean rank | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CON | 1.1 | 0.0 | 5.9 |
| AE-M | 58.5 | 13.1 | 3.1 |
| AE-HI | 55.7 | 6.0 | 3.2 |
| RT-HI | 35.2 | 2.6 | 4.2 |
| COM-M | 73.4 | 40.3 | 2.3 |
| COM-HI | 76.0 | 38.0 | 2.2 |
SUCRA, surface under the cumulative ranking curve. *Rank probability ranges from 0 to 100, where higher value indicates best intervention and lower value indicates worst intervention. AE-M, moderate-intensity aerobic exercise; AE-HI, high-intensity aerobic exercise; RT-M, moderate-intensity resistance exercise; RT-HI, high-intensity resistance exercise; COM-M, moderate-intensity combined exercise; COM-HI, high-intensity combined exercise; CON, blank controls.