. 2023 Jul 10;9:e46264. doi: 10.2196/46264

Table 3.

The estimated β coefficient (SE) of each Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C) test based on the stance-to-swing ratio groups.

Function and test			Unadjusted model (stance-to-swing ratio group)											Adjusted^a model (stance-to-swing ratio group)
			<1.50				1.50-1.63		>1.63				<1.50					1.50-1.63		>1.63
			Value, β (SE)		P value				Value, β (SE)		P value		Value, β (SE)			P value				Value, β (SE)		P value
Attention
	Digit Span Test	–5.967 (5.723)		.30		Ref^b		–6.514 (3.098)		.04		–5.474 (5.739)			.34		Ref		–4.141 (3.184)		.19
Visuospatial
	RCFT^c: copy	9.193 (5.461)		.09		Ref		0.014 (2.956)		>.99		8.913 (5.460)			.10		Ref		0.981 (3.029)		.75
Language
	S-K-BNT^d	–5.160 (5.444)		.34		Ref		–5.215 (2.947)		.08		–3.471 (5.071)			.49		Ref		–6.573 (2.813)		.02
Memory
	SVLT: DR^e	5.691 (5.979)		.34		Ref		3.817 (3.237)		.24		5.696 (5.724)			.32		Ref		3.479 (3.175)		.27
Frontal and executive
	Digit Symbol Coding	–5.344 (5.706)		.35		Ref		–8.773 (3.089)		.005		–4.092 (5.458)			.45		Ref		–7.991 (3.028)		.009
	COWAT^f: animal + ㄱ	2.766 (5.514)		.62		Ref		–4.486 (2.985)		.13		2.904 (5.538)			.60		Ref		–5.175 (3.072)		.09
	TMT-E: B^g	4.016 (5.338)		.45		Ref		–6.269 (2.890)		.03		5.552 (5.290)			.29		Ref		–5.206 (2.934)		.08
	K-CWST: 60sec^h	–3.049 (5.680)		.59		Ref		–7.855 (3.075)		.01		–2.318 (5.545)			.68		Ref		–8.083 (3.076)		0=.009

^aThis result was adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercises, and BMI.

^bRef: reference.

^cRCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test.

^dS-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test.

^eSVLT: DR: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall.

^fCOWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test.

^gTMT-E: B: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B.

^hK-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60seconds.