Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;25:e45922. doi: 10.2196/45922

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies.

Authors, publication year Registration number Value, n Age (years), mean % male sex Indications for anticoagulation Description of the intervention Drug Follow-up (months), mean Primary outcome Thromboembolic events: intervention (%)/
control (%)
Major bleeding: intervention (%)/
control (%)
Mortality: intervention (%)/
control (%)
TTRa: intervention (%)/
control (%)
Ageno et al (1998) [32] N/Ab 101 52 N/A Valvular heart disease: 100% Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment made by phone or fax Warfarin 10 Average number of INRc tests N/A N/A N/A 55.2/
55.3
Ayutthaya et al (2018) [7] TCTR20180614006 50 57.6 40 AFd: 62%
DVTe/PEf: 30%
Valvular heart disease: 34%
Telephone follow-up by pharmacists Warfarin 3 TTR (Rosendaal method), number of patients with out-of-range INR 12/
24
8/4 0/4 49.8/
28
Borgman et al (2012) [28] NCT00993200 26 53 54 AF: 34.5%
DVT: 46%
Cerebrovascular disease: 7%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment (genotype information added) Warfarin 3 Time to first stable therapeutic INR N/A N/A N/A 77.7/
70.3
Christensen et al (2011) [30] N/A 123 N/A 74.8 AF: 53.4%
Cerebrovascular disease: 9.7%
DVT/PE: 16.3%
Valvular heart disease: 12.5%
Others: 13.2%
Self-testing and dose adjustments made through a web-based system Warfarin 11 TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A 0/0 79.9/
72.7
Cox et al (2020) [19] NCT01927367 1133 72.3 61.8 AF: 100% Web-based, point-of-care CDSSg designed to enable rapid, evidence-based treatment of AF Warfarin and DOACh (29%) 12 AF-related emergency department visit or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization, and major bleeding N/A 1.5/
1.2
4.7/
3.8
N/A
Fihn et al (1994) [20] N/A 620 61 71 AF: 17%
Cerebrovascular disease: 10%
Systemic embolism: 6%
DVT/PE: 26%
Others: 42%
Computer-generated recommendation for scheduling the next visit Warfarin 8 Follow-up interval scheduled and the quality of anticoagulation control 1.9/
0.9
4.3/
4.7
0/0 N/A
Fitzmaurice et al (1996) [27] N/A 23 N/A N/A AF: 13%
Systemic embolism: 4.3%
DVT/PE: 43.4%
Valvular heart disease: 30.4%
Others: 8.6%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin 12 Percentage of INR results in therapeutic range 7.1/0 0/0 7.1/
14.3
N/A
Fitzmaurice et al (2000) [17] N/A 367 N/A 55 AF: 48%
Cerebrovascular disease: 4%
Systemic embolism: 2%
DVT/PE: 20%
Valvular heart disease: 16%
Near-patient testing and computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin 12 INR control (point prevalence of patients achieving individual therapeutic INR targets) and TTR 1.6/4 0/0 2.4/
2.5
69/
62
Fitzmaurice et al (2002) [9] N/A 49 65 75.5 AF: 55.1%
Others: 44.9%
Self-testing and self-management of anticoagulation. Remote support available through pager and telephone Warfarin 6 TTR (method not mentioned) N/A 0/3.8 0/3.8 74/
77
Gadisseur et al (2003) [23] N/A 320 58.5 71.3 AF: 21.3%
Cerebrovascular disease: 1.3%
Systemic embolism: 2.2%
DVT/PE: 20.3%
Valvular heart disease: 19.1%
Others: 35.6%
Self-testing with or without self-management of OATi by patients (phone support by the anticoagulation clinic) Phenprocoumon and acenocoumarol 6 Quality of anticoagulation therapy; thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events 0/0 2/1.4 N/A 67.7/
64.7
Guo et al (2020) [40] ChiCTR-OOC-17014138 2473 68.9 62 AF: 100% Use of mobile app for integrated management of AF, including anticoagulation management VKAsj and DOACs (60%) 20 Composite of stroke, thromboembolism, all-cause death, and rehospitalization 0.8/5 0/0.4 0.9/
2.6
N/A
Khan et al (2004) [37] N/A 79 73 60 AF: 100% Self-testing and dose adjustment made by physician by telephone Warfarin 6 TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A N/A 71.1/
70.4
Manotti et al (2001) [35] N/A 1251 67.1 54.8 Systemic embolism: 26%
DVT/PE: 21.2%
Valvular heart disease: 14.6%
Others: 38.1%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin and acenocoumarol 8.1 Percentage of patients reaching a stable INR and TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A N/A 71.2/
68.2
Matchar et al (2010) [24] NCT00032591 2922 67 98 AF: 76.5%
Valvular heart disease: 23.4%
Self-testing and dose adjustments made by phone, after communication of results using interactive voice-response system Warfarin 36 Time to first major event (stroke, major bleeding episode, or death) 4.8/
5.6
12.2/
13.6
10.3/
10.7
66.2/
62.4
Nieuwlaat et al (2012) [25] NCT01024452 1298 68.6 62.3 AF: 47.7%
Cerebrovascular disease: 3.6%
Valvular heart disease: 25.1%
DVT/PE: 15.8%
Others: 7.9%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment and scheduling the next visit Warfarin 5.3 TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A N/A 71/
71.9
Poller et al (1993) [31] N/A 186 64.5 57.5 AF: 12.4%
Cerebrovascular disease: 5.4%
Systemic embolism: 30.1%
Valvular heart disease: 8.1%
DVT/PE: 39.8%
Others: 4.3%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin 6 Binary indicator for out-of-range INR N/A 0/0 0.8/0 N/A
Poller et al (1998) [26] N/A 285 N/A N/A N/A Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin and acenocoumarol N/A TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A N/A 63.3/
53.2
Poller et al (2008) [21] N/A 13,052 66.9 53.5 AF: 45.6%
DVT/PE: 24.5%
Valvular heart disease: 13%
Others: 16.8%
Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin, acenocoumarol, and phenprocoumon N/A Incidence of clinical events (bleeding or thrombotic) 1.4/
1.6
1.4/
1.5
1.1/
0.9
65.9/
64.7
Rasmussen et al (2012) [29] N/A 54 70 57 N/A Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin 7 TTR (Rosendaal method) N/A N/A N/A 53.1/
55
Sidhu and O’Kane (2001) [8] N/A 100 60.9 46 Valvular heart disease: 100% Self-testing and self-management of anticoagulation. Physician available remotely for doubts Warfarin 24 Number of tests in therapeutic range and TTR (Rosendaal method) 21.9/
22.9
2.4/0 0/8.3 76.6/
63.8
Staresinic et al (2006) [33] N/A 192 69.3 97.4 AF: 41.1%
Stroke: 9.9%
DVT/PE: 12%
Valvular heart disease: 18.8%
Others: 18.2%
Laboratory testing of INR. dose adjustment and counseling made by phone contact by the clinic staff Warfarin 36 TTR (Rosendaal method) 4/9.5 49/
45.7
13.2/
9.5
57.8/
55.1
Vadher et al (1997) [22] N/A 177 62.9 56.5 N/A Computer-assisted algorithm for anticoagulant dose adjustment Warfarin N/A TTR (Rosendaal method) 5.4/
2.2
N/A N/A 60.7/
51.6
Verret et al (2012) [38] NCT01033279 114 57.7 68 AF: 50.8%
Valvular heart disease: 42.1%
Others: 7%
Self-testing and self-management of anticoagulation. Pharmacist supervision through voicemail messages and telephone contact Warfarin 4 Anticoagulation-related quality of life 0/0 3.4/
1.7
0/0 N/A
Vogeler et al (2021) [34] N/A 30 61 93.5 LVADk: 100% Self-testing, results transmitted via telemedicine device, and remote dose adjustment by clinic staff Warfarin and phenprocoumon 12 TTR (Rosendaal method) 26/
6.6
N/A N/A 58/
78
Zhu et al (2021) [36] ChiCTR1800016204 721 50.1 61 Valvular heart disease: 100% Internet-based anticoagulation management via a mobile user interface medical platform Warfarin 12 TTR (Rosendaal method) 0.2/
0.5
0.5/
1.1
0/0.5 53/
46

aTTR: time in therapeutic range.

bN/A: not available.

cINR: international normalized ratio.

dAF: atrial fibrillation.

eDVT: deep venous thrombosis.

fPE: pulmonary embolism.

gCDSS: clinical decision support system.

hDOAC: direct oral anticoagulant.

iOAT: oral anticoagulation therapy.

jVKA: vitamin K antagonist.

kLVAD: left ventricular assist device.