Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 9;13(4):806–819. doi: 10.3390/clinpract13040073

Table 2.

Comparison of p16, p53, and Ki-67 expression according to grades and stages.

Total N (%) p16 p Value p53 Ki-67 p Value
Negative, N (%) Weak, N (%) Moderate, N (%) Strong, N (%) Negative, N (%) Positive, N (%) p Value Low Index, N (%) High Index, N (%)
Diagnosis Papillary UC 30
(48.4%)
13
(21.0%)
1
(1.6%)
7
(11.3%)
9
(14.5%)
26
(41.9%)
4
(6.5%)
23
(37.1%)
7
(11.3%)
Non-papillary UC 32
(51.6%)
15
(24.2%)
2
(3.2%)
4
(6.5%)
11
(17.7%)
27
(43.5%)
5
(8.1%)
18
(29.0%)
14
(22.6%)
Total 62
(100%)
28
(45.2%)
3
(4.8%)
11
(17.7%)
20
(32.3%)
0.69 53
(85.5%)
9
(14.5%)
0.54 41
(66.1%)
21
(33.9%)
0.07
Grade High grade 34
(54.8%)
14
(22.6%)
1
(1.6%)
10
(16.1%)
9
(14.5%)
29
(46.8%)
5
(8.1%)
25
(40.3%)
9
(14.5%)
Low grade 28
(45.2%)
14
(22.6%)
2
(3.2%)
1
(1.6%)
11
(17.7%)
24
(38.7%)
4
(6.5%)
16
(25.8%)
12
(19.4%)
Total 62
(100.0%)
28
(45.2%)
3
(4.8%)
11
(17.7%)
20
(32.3%)
0.24 53
(85.5%)
9
(14.5%)
0.06 41
(66.1%)
21
(33.9%)
0.69
Stage Stage pT1 32
(51.6%)
15
(24.2%)
0
(0.0%)
8
(12.9%)
9
(14.5%)
27
(43.5%)
5
(8.1%)
24
(38.7%)
8
(12.9%)
Stage pT2 30
(48.4%)
13
(21.0%)
3
(4.8%)
3
(4.8%)
11
(17.7%)
26
(41.9%)
4
(6.5%)
17
(27.4%)
13
(21.0%)
Total 62
(100.0%)
28
(45.2%)
3
(4.8%)
11
(17.7%)
20
(32.3%)
0.13 53
(85.5%)
9
(14.5%)
0.54 41
(66.1%)
21
(33.9%)
0.1