. 2023 Jul 25;13(32):22375–22388. doi: 10.1039/d3ra03172a

Comparison of the electrochemical performance of the present composite-80 compared with those of PANI/CNFs based composites reported previously.

Composites	Highest specific capacitance/current density	Cycle number/current rate	Retention	Ref.
Bacterial cellulose/PANI	273 F g⁻¹/0.2 Ag⁻¹	1000 cycles/0.4 A g⁻¹	94.3%	16
PANI/cellulose hydrogels	1003.5 mF cm⁻²/1 mA cm⁻²	2000 cycles/100 mV s⁻¹	90%	23
PANI/CNFs/graphite nanoplatelets	421.5 F g⁻¹/1 A g⁻¹	1000 cycles/8 A g⁻¹	78.3%	24
PANI/graphene/bacterial cellulose	4.16 F cm⁻²/1 mA cm⁻² corresponding to 452.2 F g⁻¹/0.11 A g⁻¹	2000 cycles/5 mA cm⁻² corresponding to 2000 cycles/0.54 A g⁻¹	91.5%	26
PANI/cellulose/polyacrylamide	835 mF cm⁻²/1 mA cm⁻² corresponding to 251.8 F g⁻¹/0.3 A g⁻¹	5000 cycles/200 mV s⁻¹	96%	28
MXene/CNF-PANI	327 F g⁻¹/3 mA cm⁻²	3000 cycles/50 mA cm⁻²	71.6%	58
Composite-80	566.2 F g⁻¹/1 A g⁻¹	1000 cycles/15 A g⁻¹	85.4%	This work