Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;34(2):237–244. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.967

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.

Authors Year Study design PVA type Group Cases (n) Female (n) Mean age (year) Preoperative VAS Preoperative ODI Follow-up (months)
        Curved 30 18 71.8+11.2 8.0+1.1 - 3
Cheng and Liu[11] 2019 RCT PVP Straight 22 12 69.8±12.1 8.3±0.7 - 3
        Curved 25 17 70.7+6.8 7.9+0.6 40.1+3.5 3
Geng et al.[12] 2021 RCT PVP Straight 31 21 70.4±6.6 7.9±0.5 40.1±4.7 3
        Curved 36 26 75.6+6.1 7.6+1.3 70.8+10.0 6
Wang et all10! 2021 RCT PKP Straight 36 24 76.5±6.2 7.4±1.0 72.6±9.4 6
        Curved 29 26 70.7+7.5 8.3+1.0 75.0+11.1 12
Zhong et al.[8] 2019 RCS PVP Straight 75 63 73.8±8.2 8.2±0.8 73.4±11.7 12
PVA: Percutaneous vertebral augmentation; RCT: Randomized-controlled trial; RCS: Retrospective, controlled study; PVP: Percutaneous vertebroplasty; PKP: Percutaneous kyphoplasty; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; ODI: Oswestry Disability Index.