Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 27;34(2):432–438. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1073

Table 3. Literature studies showing the relationship between cortical thickness measured in different anatomical regions and bone mineral densitometry.

Study Year Anatomic region Measurement type Critical value for low BMI
Tingart et al.[21] 2003 Proximal humerus CCT CI <4 mm
Sah et al.[18] 2007 Femur diaphysis CTI CTI <0.40
Rodriguez-Soto et al.[17] 2010 Femoral neck CTI Unspecified
Spross et al.[20] 2015 Proximal humerus DTI DTI <1.4
Webber et al.[22] 2015 Distal radius BCT BCT <5 mm
Baumgärtner et al.[14] 2015 Proximal femur CTI Unspecified
Patterson et al.[16] 2016 Distal tibia CBT (AP and Lat) CT (AP) <3.5 mm
He et al.[15] 2018 Distal femur CBT and DFCI CBT <4.4 mm and DFCI <1.10 mm
Schmidutz et al.[19] 2021 Distal radius CI Unspecified
Yoshii et al.[23] 2021 3rd metacarpal bone CTR Unspecified
BMI: Body mass index; CCT: Combine cortical thickness; CI: Cortical index; CTI: Cortical thickness index; DTI: Deltoid tuberosity index; BCT: Bicortical thickness; CBT: Cortical bone thickness; AP: Anterior posterior; Lat: Lateral; DFCI: Distal femoral cortical index; CT: Cortical thickness; CTR: Cortical thickness ratio.