. 2021 Sep 7;104(3):00368504211038186. doi: 10.1177/00368504211038186

Table 2.

Evaluation of mesiodistal dimensions of permanent teeth in different malocclusion groups.

Jaw	Tooth	Class I	Class II	Class III	p
Maxillary	U1	8.25 ± 0.56^a	8.48 ± 0.61^b	8.39 ± 0.60^ab	0.047*
	U2	6.35 ± 0.58^a	6.58 ± 0.64^b	6.52 ± 0.60^ab	0.035*
	U3	7.44 ± 0.46	7.60 ± 0.50	7.52 ± 0.50	0.108
	U4	6.72 ± 0.44^a	6.89 ± 0.45^b	6.88 ± 0.48^ab	0.033*
	U5	6.44 ± 0.47^a	6.66 ± 0.56^b	6.60 ± 0.48^ab	0.018*
	U6	9.74 ± 0.56^a	9.91 ± 0.52^ab	9.95 ± 0.47^b	0.025*
	U7	9.33 ± 0.68	9.50 ± 0.62	9.33 ± 0.71	0.191
Mandibular	L1	4.96 ± 0.49^a	5.23 ± 0.36^b	5.11 ± 0.39^b	<0.001**
	L2	5.53 ± 0.42^a	5.70 ± 0.53^b	5.63 ± 0.40^ab	0.048*
	L3	6.23 ± 0.44^a	6.42 ± 0.40^b	6.46 ± 0.48^b	0.002*
	L4	6.71 ± 0.44	6.85 ± 0.41	6.83 ± 0.48	0.113
	L5	6.86 ± 0.59	6.97 ± 0.45	6.93 ± 0.48	0.353
	L6	10.41 ± 0.67	10.46 ± 0.56	10.62 ± 0.64	0.087
	L7	9.76 ± 0.64^a	9.40 ± 0.76^b	9.89 ± 0.63^a	<0.001**

a, b, ab upper icons: The difference between the groups (the same letter in each group shows that there is no difference between the groups). The comparisons between the groups were made by one-way analysis of variance. Tukey multiple comparison test was used to determine the difference groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.