. 2021 Sep 7;104(3):00368504211038186. doi: 10.1177/00368504211038186

Table 3.

Statistical evaluation of the buccolingual dimensions of permanent teeth in different malocclusion groups.

Jaw	Tooth	Class I	Class II	Class III	p
Maxillary	U1	7.03 ± 0.56^ab	7.10 ± 0.52^a	6.68 ± 0.58^b	0.017*
	U2	6.19 ± 0.53	6.29 ± 0.55	6.17 ± 0.56	0.362
	U3	7.59 ± 0.70	7.70 ± 0.64	7.66 ± 0.63	0.557
	U4	8.81 ± 0.58^ab	8.95 ± 0.48^a	8.73 ± 0.54^b	0.031*
	U5	8.94 ± 0.57^ab	9.13 ± 0.50^a	8.87 ± 0.59^b	0.011*
	U6	10.21 ± 0.59	10.32 ± 0.59	10.27 ± 0.62	0.512
	U7	9.87 ± 0.72	9.90 ± 0.64	9.81 ± 0.75	0.66
Mandibular	L1	5.88 ± 0.48^a	5.96 ± 0.41^a	5.71 ± 0.49^b	0.002*
	L2	6.14 ± 0.52^a	6.17 ± 0.44^a	5.89 ± 0.42^b	<0.001**
	L3	6.91 ± 0.65	7.12 ± 0.56	6.97 ± 0.52	0.055
	L4	7.38 ± 0.53^ab	7.44 ± 0.50^a	7.24 ± 0.47^b	0.029*
	L5	8.06 ± 0.54^ab	8.11 ± 0.49^a	7.88 ± 0.52^b	0.016*
	L6	9.37 ± 0..60	9.35 ± 0.51	9.27 ± 0.52	0.441
	L7	8.89 ± 0.62	8.94 ± 0.58	9.01 ± 0.53	0.418

a, b, ab upper icons: The difference between the groups (the same letter in each group shows that there is no difference between the groups). The comparisons between the groups were made by one-way analysis of variance. Tukey multiple comparison test was used to determine the different groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.