Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 24;23:72. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00585-4

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of the clinical factor model, radiomics signature, radiomics nomogram, and one experienced radiologist for detection of spinal metastasis

Set Model AUC(95%CI) Sensitivity(%) Specificity(%) Accuracy(%)
Training set Clinical model 0.715(0.641–0.791) 87.0 54.3 76.7
Radiomics signature 0.847(0.795–0.898) 75.0 73.9 74.7
Radiomics nomogram 0.856(0.804–0.907) 73.0 76.1 74.0
Radiologist 0.711 (0.630–0.783) 77.0 65.2 73.3
Validation set Clinical model 0.692(0.531–0.730) 77.3 47.6 67.7
Radiomics signature 0.743(0.668–0.861) 81.8 71.4 78.5
Radiomics nomogram 0.853(0.764–0.919) 84.1 85.7 84.6
Radiologist 0.613 (0.484–0.731) 75.0 47.6 66.2
External test set Clinical model 0.540(0.517–0.651) 86.5 30.6 59.4
Radiomics signature 0.754(0.595–0.748) 71.2 63.3 67.3
Radiomics nomogram 0.762(0.605–0.751) 78.8 67.1 68.3
Radiologist 0.632 (0.531–0.726) 67.3 59.2 63.4

AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval