Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;18:31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01286-z

Table 3.

Design and methodological approaches identified in implementation outcomes research (n = 400)

All Acceptability Adoption Appropriateness Cost Feasibility Fidelity Penetration Sustainability
(n = 400) (n = 210) (n = 106) (n = 87) (n = 31) (n = 154) (n = 157) (n = 64) (n = 63)
Design
 Instrument development 5.3% 2.9% 3.8% 4.6% 3.2% 4.5% 6.4% 1.6% 1.6%
 Observational 66.5% 70.0% 67.0% 71.3% 67.7% 73.4% 58.0% 76.6% 82.5%
 Quasi-experimental 6.8% 7.1% 9.4% 8.0% 6.5% 6.5% 6.4% 7.8% 14.3%
 Experimental 21.5% 20.0% 19.8% 16.1% 22.6% 15.6% 29.3% 14.1% 1.6%
Number of observations
 Cross-sectional 42.8% 45.2% 40.6% 47.1% 38.7% 42.2% 29.3% 43.8% 44.4%
 Pre-post 15.3% 22.4% 17.0% 17.2% 12.9% 21.4% 16.6% 12.5% 12.7%
 Longitudinal (> 3) 36.5% 29.0% 38.7% 29.9% 45.2% 31.2% 47.8% 42.2% 41.3%
Type of data used to assess
 Qualitative 17.5% 33.3% 19.8% 44.8% 19.4% 23.4% 13.4% 12.5% 28.6%
 Quantitative 48.5% 37.1% 66.0% 24.1% 67.7% 48.1% 66.2% 68.8% 44.4%
 Multi/mixed 32.5% 28.6% 12.3% 29.9% 12.9% 27.9% 17.2% 17.2% 23.8%
Role in analysis
 Descriptive (e.g., univariate) 62.5% 87.6% 78.3% 92.0% 87.1% 87.0% 68.8% 76.6% 79.4%
 Correlation (e.g., association) 8.3% 6.2% 12.3% 4.6% 3.2% 5.2% 12.7% 14.1% 19.0%
 Independent variable (e.g., predictor) 4.5% 3.8% 3.8% 2.3% 3.2% 1.3% 9.6% 6.3% 3.2%
 Dependent variable (e.g., outcome) 24.3% 11.0% 19.8% 8.0% 12.9% 11.7% 29.3% 23.4% 22.2%