Table 3.
Pair-wise comparison of groups with respect to the mean number of viable cells by Tukey's honestly significant difference multiple post hoc test
Comparison | Mean difference | p-value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
Positive vs group DNS | 234.333 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Positive vs group ORS | 223.733 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Positive vs group RL | 201.800 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Positive vs group EW | 205.600 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Positive vs group IMF | 180.000 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Negative vs group DNS | −286.466 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Negative vs group ORS | −297.066 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Negative vs group RL | −319.000 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Negative vs group EW | −315.200 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Negative vs group IMF | −340.800 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Group DNS vs group ORS | −10.600 | 0.904 | Not significant |
Group DNS vs group RL | −32.533 | 0.005 | Significant |
Group DNS vs group EW | −28.733 | 0.023 | Significant |
Group DNS vs group IMF | −54.333 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Group ORS vs group RL | −21.933 | 0.181 | Not significant |
Group ORS vs group EW | −18.133 | 0.405 | Not significant |
Group ORS vs group IMF | −43.733 | <0.001** | Highly significant |
Group RL vs group EW | 3.800 | 1.000 | Not significant |
Group RL vs group IMF | −21.800 | 0.187 | Not significant |
Group EW vs group IMF | −25.600 | 0.065 | Not significant |
**, highly significant p < 0.01