Skip to main content
. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):448–452. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2599

Table 3.

Intergroup and intragroup comparison of % change in E. faecalis count before and after instrumentation (S1–S2) and after medication (S2–S3)

Groups The mean (±SD) E. faecalis count before instrumentation (S1) (CFU/mL) (log 10 ) Percentile % change in E. faecalis count after instrumentation and after medication (S1–S2) % change in E. faecalis count after instrumentation and after medication (S2–S3)
I (N = 15) 6.01 (±0.23) 25 Percentile 35.1386 59.3337
50 Percentile 35.7242 60.6489
75 Percentile 35.9265 61.4222
II (N = 15) 6.03 (±0.24) 25 Percentile 35.5328 66.5532
50 Percentile 35.8750 68.9342
75 Percentile 36.1748 70.3499
III (N = 15) 6.01 (±0.28) 25 Percentile 35.2681 63.3136
50 Percentile 35.7783 64.5306
75 Percentile 36.3011 66.0085
IV (N = 15) 6.03 (±0.27) 25 Percentile 35.3494 70.3496
50 Percentile 35.8422 71.9292
75 Percentile 36.3200 72.6235
Post hoc pairwise comparison using Tukey's test Group IV > II > III > I