Table 2.

Global Quality Score criteria

Description of quality	Grading
Poor quality, poor flow of the video, most important information missing, not at all useful for patients	1
Generally poor quality and poor flow, some information listed but many important topics missing, of very limited use to patients	2
Moderate quality, suboptimal flow, some important information is adequately discussed but some poorly discussed, somewhat useful for patients	3
Good quality and generally good flow. Most of the relevant information is listed, but some topics not covered, useful for patients	4
Excellent quality and flow, very useful for patients	5