Table 2.
An overview of some common challenges encountered in conventional microbial fuel cell technology.
| Main obstacles | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| High internal resistance | The involvement of PEMs or separators between the anodic and cathodic chambers introduced additional resistance to proton transport. | [145,146] |
| Limited scalability | Scaling up dual-chamber MFCs is challenging due to the increased complexity and potential issues associated with maintaining the PEMs. | [111] |
| Low coulombic efficiency | The separation of anodic and cathodic chambers by PEM can lead to side reactions or electron losses, reducing the overall efficiency of electron transfer. | [144,147] |
| Low power density | MFCs currently have lower energy conversion efficiency due to electron losses by high internal resistance. | [141] |
| Maintenance and system complexity | MFCs require regular maintenance to prevent membrane fouling, electrode degradation and system failures. | [141] |
| Membrane fouling | PEMs in dual-chamber MFCs are susceptible to scaling or fouling attributed to the accumulation of biofilms, salts, or other contaminants, lowering the membrane permeability and hindering proton transport. | [144,147] |
| Slow startup and lag phase | MFCs often require a startup period for exoelectrogens or microbial colonization and biofilm formation, leading to a delay in power generation as low cell density is inefficient for electron transfer. | [148] |