Table 2. Comparison of the proposed selection with random selection and uniform selection. The data format in the table is the mean (standard deviation).
Setting | 5% | 10% | 25% | 50% | 100% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRF | Ours | 0.776 (0.199) | 0.795 (0.186) | 0.809 (0.161) | 0.821 (0.155) | 0.824 (0.148) |
Random selection | 0.767 (0.208) | 0.789 (0.198) | 0.802 (0.177) | 0.818 (0.165) | 0.824 (0.148) | |
Uniform selection | 0.759 (0.218) | 0.770 (0.185) | 0.799 (0.171) | 0.814 (0.163) | 0.824 (0.148) | |
PED | Ours | 0.646 (0.206) | 0.676 (0.209) | 0.691 (0.215) | 0.704 (0.207) | 0.724 (0.196) |
Random selection | 0.633 (0.221) | 0.651 (0.227) | 0.687 (0.217) | 0.689 (0.228) | 0.724 (0.196) | |
Uniform selection | 0.620 (0.206) | 0.659 (0.209) | 0.673 (0.218) | 0.676 (0.237) | 0.724 (0.196) | |
Choroid | Ours | 0.875 (0.076) | 0.879 (0.077) | 0.886 (0.066) | 0.891 (0.076) | 0.895 (0.073) |
Random selection | 0.872 (0.071) | 0.876 (0.078) | 0.881 (0.080) | 0.884 (0.079) | 0.895 (0.073) | |
Uniform selection | 0.872 (0.087) | 0.875 (0.078) | 0.880 (0.086) | 0.890 (0.084) | 0.895 (0.073) |