Table 4. The ablation study on the HD errors evaluated on the JHU MS test set.
| Methods | ILM | RNFL-GCL | IPL-INL | INL-OPL | OPL-ONL | ELM | IS-OS | OS-RPE | BM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average 95% HD | |||||||||
| OursWithoutDDP | 5.42 | 8.38 | 7.24 | 7.63 | 7.45 | 5.99 | 4.66 | 7.55 | 5.92 |
| Ours | 5.44 | 8.11 | 7.31 | 7.5 | 7.59 | 5.85 | 4.47 | 7.50 | 5.90 |
| DDP’s improvement | −0.37% | 3.33% | −0.96% | 1.73% | −1.84% | 2.39% | 4.25% | 0.67% | 0.34% |
|
Average HD | |||||||||
| OursWithoutDDP | 8.32 | 13.96 | 11.62 | 12.03 | 11.99 | 8.83 | 7.85 | 10.52 | 8.38 |
| Ours | 8.18 | 13.12 | 11.33 | 10.97 | 11.22 | 8.25 | 6.75 | 10.36 | 8.2 |
| DDP’s improvement | 1.71% | 6.40% | 2.56% | 9.66% | 6.86% | 7.03% | 16.30% | 1.54% | 2.20% |