Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;48(16):1127–1137. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004722

TABLE 3.

Summary of the Surgical Characteristics of the Study Population

Unit/category Patients with data at V0-V2 n=99 Patients with data at V0-V3 n=57 Patients with data at V0-V4 n=41 Statistical difference between visits P
V0-V2 vs. V0-V3 V0-V2 vs. V0-V4
Surgical time Minutes 192.7±110.7 169.6±94.5 171.4±84.0 0.20 0.22
Surgical type Lumbar fusion 47 30 23 0.48 0.93
Lumbar decompression and fusion 32 16 10
Cervical decompression and fusion (ventral) 8 6 4
Cervical decompression and fusion 4 2 1
Kyphoplasty 2 1 1
Other 6 2 2
Surgical complexity Simple 42 26 18 0.41 0.89
Intermediate 41 23 18
Complex 16 8 3
Surgical levels 1.8±1.2 2.4±1.2 1.7±1.0 <0.01 0.43
Blood volume in Milliliter 74±285 57±287 3±22 0.74 0.10
Blood volume out Milliliter 397±482 289±406 346±482 0.24 0.59
Fluid in Milliliter 2572±1363 2147±1087 2282±1097 0.06 0.19
Fluid out Milliliter 231±364 159±293 126±231 0.32 0.14
Fluid balance Milliliter 2018±802 1756±675 1813±406 0.06 0.23

In line with Table 2, we again explored whether patient samples differed at visits. There were no significant differences between the samples except for more extensive surgery in patients that presented at the three-month outpatient follow-up, i.e. with data from V0-V3, as compared with all initially participating patients, i.e. from V0-V2. Although we did not expect such a substantial drop-out rate, it is plausible that patients with more extensive surgery were more likely to present to their follow-up appointment.