Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;48(16):1127–1137. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004722

TABLE 4.

Summary of Cognitive Baseline Characteristics for the Complete Patient Population at V0-V2 and the Subpopulation With Complete Data at V0-V3

CERAD item Baseline Follow-up (only V0-V3 subpopulation)
z-scores and p-values z-scores by POD status (unadjusted) z-scores by POD status (adjusted for age)
z-scores (V0-V2) n=99 z-scores (V0-V3) n=57 Statistical difference V0-V2 vs. V0-V3 P z-scores adjusted by POD status (adjusted for age) z-scores adjusted by POD status Del− n=46 Del+ n=11 Del− n=46 Del+ n=11
Verbal fluency −0.08±1.21 0.04±1.20 0.56 0.22±1.17 0.07 0.20±1.13 0.22±1.17 0.05±1.07 −0.17±1.25*
Boston Naming Test 0.33±1.16 0.44±1.24 0.55 0.74±1.06 0.01 0.75±0.93* 0.68±1.57 0.00±0.93 −0.11±1.57
Mini Mental State Exam −0.92±1.98 −0.70±1.75 0.56 −0.41±1.75 0.53 −0.34±1.77 −1.10±1.93 0.15±1.77 −0.67±1.92
WLL learning −0.61±1.33 −0.27±1.18 0.13 −0.03±1.43 0.23 0.07±1.40 −1.16±0.68 0.15±1.41 −1.02±0.71
WLL recall −0.01±1.66 0.45±1.22 0.09 0.52±1.29 0.39 0.52±1.31 −0.02±1.36 0.08±1.30 −0.32±1.33
WLL recognition −0.38±1.26 −0.20±1.42 0.40 0.32±1.23 0.01 0.32±1.33 −0.14±0.98 0.06±1.32 −0.48±1.03
Visuo-construction copy −0.17±1.53 −0.06±1.40 0.65 −0.12±1.84 0.87 0.11±1.60 −0.86±2.37 0.09±1.60 −0.55±2.33
Visuo-construction recall −0.25±1.64 −0.17±1.72 0.82 0.11±1.72 0.32 0.20±1.48 −1.23±1.44 0.13±1.47 −1.25±1.47
Trail Making Test A −0.27±1.18 −0.07±1.27 0.35 0.22±1.02 0.07 0.20±1.01 0.03±1.11 −0.04±1.02 −0.01±1.03
Trail Making Test B 0.22±1.14 0.44±1.11 0.32 0.73±1.22 0.02 0.83±1.28 0.13±1.08 0.11±1.28 −0.33±0.99*
Phonemic fluency 0.16±1.37 0.26±1.46 0.62 0.30±1.23 0.67 0.34±1.21 0.11±1.26 0.01±1.21 −0.06±1.17
Total score (mean) −0.18±0.91 0.03±0.85 0.18 0.24±0.73 0.02 0.30±0.65* −0.28±0.87 0.08±0.65 −0.44±0.86

Baseline z-scores (±SD) of CERAD items did not differ significantly between V0-V2 and V0-V3 samples, which supports that the cognitive trajectory of V0-V3 can be considered representative for the V0-V2 population. Statistical comparisons between visits (V0 vs. V3) were done pairwise in subjects with complete data at both visits (V0-V3 subpopulation; green = improvement, red = deterioration). Interestingly, we did not observe POCD on a group level but rather postoperative cognitive improvement (POCI). Subgroup analyses, however, revealed that this effect was carried by patients that were not delirious (Del−). When results were additionally adjusted for age, we did not find POCI but delirious patients (Del+) performed significantly worse at follow-up. SDs and P-values are not denoted exactly for POD subgroup analyses due to presentational purposes:

*

Statistical significance at P<0.05.

Statistical significance at P<0.01.

WLL indicates word list learning.