Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289003

Table 4. Survivorship of H. armigera (Ha-Lab) and H. zea (Hz-Lab) on leaves of Bt and non-Bt cotton technologies throughout the larval cycle in laboratory trials.

Feeding time (d) DAS-21023-5 × DAS-24236-5 × SYN-IR102-7a DAS-21023-5 × DAS-24236-5a Non-Bt cottona
n % survival (95% CI) n % survival (95% CI) n % survival (95% CI)
Helicoverpa armigera (Ha-Lab)
0 420 100.0 (99.2–100.0) a 260 100.0 (98.6–100.0) a 130 100.0 (97.3–100.0) a
5 104 25.0 (21.0–29.3) b 112 42.4 (36.6–48.4) b 121 89.0 (82.8–93.4) b
10 46 11.1 (8.3–14.4) c 76 28.8 (23.6–34.5) c 112 82.3 (75.2–88.0) b
15 23 5.5 (3.7–8.1) d 25 9.5 (6.4–13.5) d 91 67.0 (58.7–74.4) c
20 13 3.1 (1.8–5.2) de 10 3.8 (2.0–6.7) de 84 61.8 (53.4–69.6) c
25 8 2.0 (0.9–3.7) de 3 1.1 (0.3–3.2) ef 75 55.1 (46.7–63.3) c
30 3 0.7 (0.2–2.1) e 0 0.0 (0.0–1.4) f 71 52.2 (43.8–60.5) c
Helicoverpa zea (Hz-Lab) b
0 420 100.0 (99.2–100.0) a 260 100.0 (98.6–100.0) a 130 100.0 (97.3–100.0) a
5 0 0.0 (0.0–0.01) b 151 58.1 (52.0–63.9) b 111 85.4 (78.5–90.6) b

aMeans (95% CI) followed by the same letter in each column for each species and cotton variety are not significantly different due to nonoverlap of 95% CIs.

bThe evaluations were performed only up to 5 d, as there was complete mortality of the Hz-Lab population on leaves of DAS-21023-5 × DAS-24236-5 × SYN-IR102-7 cotton.