Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 25;21(7):e3001930. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001930

Table 2. Neural representation in bilateral ILOTC.

Three-way mixed ANOVA * Left ILOTC Right ILOTC
Groups (EB vs. SC) F(1, 30) = 1.809 p = 0.189 F(1, 30) = 0.466 p = 0.500
Tasks (shape vs. conceptual) F(1, 30) = 2.829 p = 0.103 F(1, 30) = 0.025 p = 0.874
Representations (shape vs. conceptual) F(1, 30) = 21.814 p < 0.001 F(1, 30) = 11.871 p = 0.002
Groups × Tasks F(1, 30) = 2.047 p = 0.163 F(1, 30) = 0.157 p = 0.695
Groups × Representations F(1, 30) = 2.056 p = 0.162 F(1, 30) = 0.055 p = 0.816
Tasks × Representations F(1, 30) = 15.596 p < 0.001 F(1, 30) = 10.116 p = 0.003
Groups × Tasks × Representations F(1, 30) = 0.097 p = 0.757 F(1, 30) = 0.066 p = 0.799

* The groups factor was between-subject, whereas tasks and representations were within-subject factors.

EB, early blind; ILOTC, inferolateral occipitotemporal cortex; SC, sighted control.