Table 4.
Results of the Linear Regression Analysis of Factors Leading to Prolonged Cecal Intubation Time.
| Factors | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-coefficient
(95% CI) |
Standard
error |
P-value | β-coefficient
(95% CI) |
Standard
error |
P-value | ||
| Older age, years | 0.020 (-0.069–16.796) | 0.046 | 0.633 | ||||
| BMI | |||||||
| Normal (18.5–25.0 kg/m2) | 1 | ||||||
| Low (<18.5 kg/m2) | 0.260 (-3.124–3.644) | 1.717 | 0.880 | ||||
| High (>25.0 kg/m2) | 2.130 (-1.027–5.286) | 2.130 | 0.185 | ||||
| History of colonoscopy | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 0.522 (-1.829–2.873) | 1.193 | 0.662 | |||||
| Previous abdominal surgery | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 1.173 (-1.184–3.530) | 1.196 | 0.328 | |||||
| Routine use of laxatives | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 0.496 (-3.139–4.130) | 1.844 | 0.788 | |||||
| Inadequate bowel preparation* | |||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 3.583 (0.578–6.588) | 1.525 | 0.020 | 3.583 (0.578–6.588) | 1.525 | 0.020 | ||
| Sigmoid colon diverticulosis | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 1.799 (-1.438–5.037) | 1.643 | 0.275 | |||||
| Use of a small-caliber colonoscope | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| -1.326 (-3.671–1.018) | 1.190 | 0.266 | |||||
| Inexperienced operator | |||||||
| 1 | |||||||
| 0.908 (-1.630–3.446) | 1.288 | 0.481 | |||||
BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval
* Fair, poor, or inadequate based on the Aronchick Bowel Preparation scale.