Table 2.
Comparison of multilevel models for the effect of current age on overall affective tone of life narratives
| Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | Estimate (SE) | 95% CI | |
| Fixed Part | ||||||||||||
| Intercept | 22.22* (1.48) | [19.28, 24.83] | 18.85* (2.04) | [14.50, 23.16] | 25.11* (2.59) | [20.09, 30.46] | 24.95* (2.61) | [20.22, 30.07] | 19.65* (3.14) | [13.26, 25.74] | 20.38* (3.56) | [13.45, 27.61] |
| Male | 6.89* (2.92) | [0.57, 12.37] | 6.96* (2.82) | [0.89, 12.50] | 7.00* (2.82) | [1.23, 12.49] | 7.17* (2.82) | [1.61, 12.87] | 7.17* (2.83) | [1.84, 13.09] | ||
| Agea | −2.40* (0.65) |
[−3.55, −1.19] |
−2.55* (0.70) | [−3.76, −1.16] |
3.18 (1.94) |
[−0.51, 7.04] |
1.71 (3.89) |
[−5.73, 9.42] | ||||
| Ageb |
0.08 (0.15) |
[−0.21, 0.33] | ||||||||||
| Age2 | −0.85* (0.28) |
[−1.41, −0.31] |
−0.25 (1.40) | [−2.84, 2.50] | ||||||||
| Age3 | −0.06 (0,14) | [−0.32, 0.19] | ||||||||||
| Random Variance | ||||||||||||
| Residual | 384.84 (19.62) | [18.34, 20.77] | 384.51 (19.61) | [18.52, 20.87] | 383.01 (19.57) | [18.31, 20.83] | 382.88 (19.57) | [18.44, 20.70] | 376.27 (19.40) | [18.24, 20.49] | 375.86 (19.39) | [18.23, 20.60] |
| Intercept | 273.55 (16.54) | [14.24, 19.04] | 262.72 (16.21) | [13.83, 18.36] | 239.50 (15.48) | [12.87, 17.90] | 239.41 (15.47) | [12.92, 17.50] | 241.47 (15.54) | [12.94, 17.62] | 242.35 (15.57) | [12.71, 17.69] |
| Model Fit | ||||||||||||
| Deviance | 6364.42 | 6358.93 | 6345.41 | 6345.15 | 6336.15 | 6335.96 | ||||||
| Δχ2 | 5.49* | 13.52* | 0.26 | 9.27* | 0.19 | |||||||
| df | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
CI = confidence intervals (based on bootstrapping). N = 698 life narratives. Sequentially adding predictors was tested with Δχ2 tests based on model deviance (−2Log-Likelihood), comparing it to the previous model (except Model 4 was compared with Model 2).
aAge was divided by 10 and centred at 0.8 decades (according to the youngest age group) to aid the estimation of quadratic and cubic effects.
bAge was within-person baseline-centred at the individually youngest age at the first measurement.
*p < .05, one-tailed