Table 3.

Within-person effects of reminders on drinking on active vs. inactive weeks.

Fixed effects	Study 1			Study 2
	Zero-inflated sub-model
	OR	95%CI	p	OR	95%CI	p
Intercept	1.77	[.26–11.8]	.558	10.4	[2.96–36.5]	< .001
Active week (vs. inactive)	1.34	[1.01–1.77]	.041	1.39	[1.08–1.80]	.011
Perspective condition (vs. mindful)	1.21	[.71–2.05]	.489	1.06	[0.60–1.87]	.845
Signal count	1.01	[1.01–1.02]	< .001	1.00	[0.99–1.00]	.458
Number of responses	1.03	[0.99–1.07]	.149	1.02	[1.00–1.04]	.109
Social weekend (vs. week)	0.50	[0.40- .61]	< .001	0.54	[0.45–0.65]	< .001
Perspective condition (vs. mindful) *active week (vs. inactive)	0.93	[0.62- 1.41]	.741	0.95	[0.66–1.38]	.796

Random effects	Variance	SD	Variance	SD
Intercept
Participant ID* Group ID	< .011	.938	.200	.447
Participant ID	< .001	< .001	.079	.282

Fixed Effects	Conditional sub-model
	OR	95%CI	p	OR	95%CI	p
Intercept	3.56	[0.93–13.7]	.065	1.79	[0.87–3.68]	.111
Active week (vs. inactive)	0.92	[0.69–1.23]	.575	0.97	[0.77–1.23]	.816
Perspective condition (vs. mindful)	1.02	[0.69–1.51]	.919	.054	[0.38–0.76]	< .001
Signal count	1.00	[0.99–1.00]	.158	1.01	[1.00–1.01]	.041
Number of responses	0.99	[0.96–1.01]	.284	0.99	[0.98–1.01]	.353
Social weekend	1.56	[1.26–1.93]	< .001	1.27	[1.06–1.53]	.009
Perspective condition (vs. mindful) *active week (vs. inactive)	1.09	[.72–1.65]	.687	1.27	[0.89–1.80]	.186

Random effects	Variance	SD	Variance	SD
Intercept
Participant ID* Group ID	229	.478	1.879	1.371
Participant ID	.028	.167	.738	.859

Study 1: 3577 observations nested within 71 participants across 10 groups; Study 2: 6729 observations nested within 147 participants across 23 groups. The zero-inflation sub-model of the hurdle model estimates the probability of an extra zero (no alcohol use) such that a positive estimate indicates a higher chance of no alcohol use. Perspective = perspective-taking; mindful = mindfulness.